About Us Consumers Advisers Employers Media |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adviser > Technical Central > Support material > Case Studies > Buy to let case study Buy to let case studyOne attractive feature of UK pensions is that they are allowed to invest in commercial property and benefit from various tax breaks that would not otherwise be available. For example, the property can be leased with the rent being paid directly into the pension scheme – tax-free. Whilst commercial property investment has long been available to UK pension schemes, Pensions Simplification has removed a major restriction from 6 April 2006 (A-Day) - people can now use their pension scheme to purchase a property that they or an ‘associate’ (e.g. spouse, close relative) own. There are certain conditions which must be met however. In particular, if the property is rented by a member of the pension scheme or an associate of the member on a non-commercial basis, it will be treated as a benefit-in-kind and a tax charge will apply. 40% of the difference between the commercial rate and the rate actually paid by the member or associate will be chargeable to the pension scheme member and there may also be other tax charges levied on the pension scheme itself. It is possible for the scheme Trustees to borrow money to assist in the purchase of a property. The amount that can be borrowed is limited to 50% of the current value of the scheme, less any outstanding loans. 100% of scheme assets plus any scheme borrowings can be used to purchase a property and pay for the associated costs e.g. legal fees. Example Gemma runs a successful sandwich shop on her local high street. She bought the shop 10 years ago using money that was left to her when a family member died. Since Gemma started to run her own company she has been paying what she thought was the maximum contribution into a personal pension plan. Before she became self-employed she worked for a large company that had a good contracted-in money purchase pension scheme (CIMP). She currently has a paid-up benefit of £82,000 in that scheme. Gemma has heard that there can be tax advantages in having a property as an asset of a pension scheme and thinks that it might be a good idea to sell her shop to her pension scheme. She speaks to her financial adviser who explains that under the new pension rules it is possible for her to sell her shop to her pension scheme. He advises her that a market value must be paid by the pension scheme when it buys the property from her and that the company must also pay a market rate of rent to the pension scheme, otherwise tax charges will apply. It is also possible for Gemma to increase her gross pension contributions as the amount that she can pay towards her pensions (and receive tax relief) increased to 100% of earnings from A-Day. After speaking to her adviser Gemma is interested in using the money from her paid-up CIMP to buy the sandwich shop, valued at £110,000. She would like to keep the money in her personal pension plan separate to spread her overall investment risk. Gemma sets up a self-invested personal pension plan (SIPP) and transfers the money from the CIMP into it. She also starts to pay £7,500 per annum into the SIPP on top of the premiums that she’s already paying into her personal pension. She speaks to her adviser who confirms that her SIPP is worth £85,000 and that an additional £42,500 could be borrowed by the pension scheme bringing the total amount available to purchase the shop to £127,500. Gemma has to remember that her pension plan may have to cover all the costs involved in the purchase of the shop e.g. legal fees and survey costs. The IFA arranges for Gemma’s SIPP to buy the shop using a combination of existing money and borrowings, with the remainder of the SIPP invested in insured funds. Once purchased:
Buying property this way can be very tax efficient. This is highlighted below in a comparison between a person using their pension scheme and an individual buying a property themselves:
References to taxation are based on our understanding of the current law and practice and may be affected by changes in legislation or by an individual’s particular circumstances. This case study is an example only, and whilst it highlights some of the opportunities for planning, it should be recognised that it is not a complete or exhaustive description of the opportunities or pitfalls. This information is based on our current understanding of the Finance Act 2004, Finance Act 2005 and other relevant legislation.
Published April 2006 Updated 30 May 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to top
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||