Register for updates

Sign up to get the latest BeeLines sent direct to your inbox. You can unsubscribe later if you wish.

BeeHive  >  BeeLines  >  World pension summit

World pension summit

Believe it or not, Iím writing this particular BeeLine while sitting in a cafe in Killarney. Weíre over here for a few days over Easter and itís given me the chance to chill out for once and stop thinking about UK pensions for a while. Iíve been reading about Irish Pensions instead, and my wife, as you can probably imagine, is absolutely delighted. I could tell that last night when we were dining out with friends and I managed to steer the topic of conversation around to the Irish pension reforms. Some of you will know Iíve been pretty keen on Irish pensions ever since I spoke at an International Pensions conference with Charlie McCreevey a couple of years ago. Charlie McCreevey is the Irish Finance Minister.

The big pension story over in Ireland at the moment is the advent of the new Personal Retirement Savings Accounts which, predictably enough, are referred to by one and all as PRSAs. They are like our Stakeholder Personal Pensions in that they are targeted at getting lower paid workers to invest their hard-earned Euros in pensions. Like Stakeholder Pensions PRSAs are flexible, low-cost products that are price-capped. Another similarity is that the Irish Government is putting a great deal of faith in the PRSAs achieving the pensions holy grail of increased distribution to millions of currently unpensioned workers.

The price-capping on the PRSA is not as severe as on UK Stakeholder plans as I understand it. The standard PRSA has a maximum 5% entry charge and an annual fund management fee of 1%. This allows for a satisfactory level of commission to recompense those distributing the products and seems to have met with the approval of the main Irish pension brokersí associations.

Commentators in Ireland are hopeful that capping of the new products will not have the same effect on distribution as the capping of Stakeholder pensions has had in the UK. They reason that, while some level of price control is preferable to a free-for-all on pension pricing, it has to work both in the interests of investors and distributors if the spectre of compulsory pension contributions is to be avoided. Our interesting discussions over dinner last night centred around this mainly because the World Pension Associationís annual conference is being held in Dublin next week. Not surprisingly, compulsion is a subject high on the pensions agenda worldwide. Iím not going to be at the conference myself (I only go to conferences I am asked to speak at, obviously), but I will be reading up on what happens with interest when Iím back in Blighty. Iíll probably keep you up-to-date with developments too, if youíre interested.

As I tried to explain to my wife and daughters last night, the Irish pension system with itís highly flexible benefits and sensible approach to the realities of distribution looks like a good model for a massively under-pensioned Europe to follow. Perhaps we could learn some lessons from the Irish approach too. Even though the UK has been the most pensioned part of Europe over the last forty years or so, we canít afford to be complacent. If the UK voluntary pension savings habit stalls now it would, of course, be nothing short of a national disaster. Compulsion would be a poor substitute for us, I think.

Steve Bee
24 April 2003

The information provided is based on Scottish Lifeís current understanding of the relevant legislation and regulations and may be subject to alteration as a result of changes in legislation or practice.